<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grammar Checker Software &#187; grammar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/tag/grammar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog</link>
	<description>How Grammar Checker Software Can Help Improve Your Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Grammar Too Confusing?</title>
		<link>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/is-grammar-too-confusing</link>
		<comments>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/is-grammar-too-confusing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar checker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitesmoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/whitesmoke/is-grammar-too-confusing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s Seattle Times had an terrific article on common grammar mistakes, and while James J. Kilpatrick had sound advice, I couldn&#8217;t help think that it&#8217;s all a bit too confusing.
On the one hand, there were excellent tips on using &#8220;that&#8221; and &#8220;which&#8221; (avoid &#8220;which&#8221; like the plague), and when to use &#8220;that&#8221; or &#8220;who&#8221; (&#8221;who&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Seattle Times had an terrific article on common grammar mistakes, and while James J. Kilpatrick had sound advice, I couldn&#8217;t help think that it&#8217;s all a bit too confusing.</p>
<p>On the one hand, there were excellent tips on using &#8220;that&#8221; and &#8220;which&#8221; (avoid &#8220;which&#8221; like the plague), and when to use &#8220;that&#8221; or &#8220;who&#8221; (&#8221;who&#8221; is for humans, &#8220;that&#8221; for everything else).  But then things got a bit tricky.</p>
<p>For example, in the phrase &#8220;whether or not&#8221;, the &#8220;or not&#8221; is actually redundant, since &#8220;whether&#8221; implies an option.  But, for some reason, it&#8217;s OK to be &#8220;benignly redundant&#8221; and include the &#8220;or not&#8221;.</p>
<p>Confused?  Me too!</p>
<p>On the one had I enjoy the that grammar  enables us to communicate better.  That is if we have time to understand all the rules.  But on the other hand, I tend to stick with a principle I came across a few years ago, namely write to be understood &#8211; and if it&#8217;s grammatically incorrect, that&#8217;s OK.  As long as the message gets over.</p>
<p>One caveat is that if the communication is an important one &#8211; a business letter, a college essay, or a business proposal &#8211; then use a grammar checker like <a href="http://grammarcheckersoftware.com" title="Grammar checker software">WhiteSmoke</a> to clean up the errors.    It&#8217;s well worth the investment to avoid a critical mistake when something important is on the line.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fgrammarcheckersoftware.com%2Fblog%2Fis-grammar-too-confusing';
  addthis_title  = 'Is+Grammar+Too+Confusing%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/is-grammar-too-confusing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
