<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grammar Checker Software &#187; grammar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/category/grammar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog</link>
	<description>How Grammar Checker Software Can Help Improve Your Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Indiana Jones and The Glorious Grammar Gaffe</title>
		<link>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/indiana-jones-and-the-glorious-grammar-gaffe</link>
		<comments>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/indiana-jones-and-the-glorious-grammar-gaffe#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar checker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitesmoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indiana jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temple of doom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/indiana-jones-and-the-glorious-grammar-gaffe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long awaited return of Indiana Jones is almost upon us, but clearly the layoff affected Indiana&#8217;s command of grammar.
In an interview published on CNN.com today, George Lucas began &#8220;He&#8217;s a real guy. He&#8217;s just like us&#8230;.He makes lots of mistakes.&#8221; Almost on cue, Harrison Ford said &#8220;It was the three of us, Steven, George [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long awaited return of Indiana Jones is almost upon us, but clearly the layoff affected Indiana&#8217;s command of grammar.</p>
<p>In an interview published on CNN.com today, George Lucas began &#8220;He&#8217;s a real guy. He&#8217;s just like us&#8230;.He makes lots of mistakes.&#8221; Almost on cue, Harrison Ford said &#8220;It was the three of us, Steven, George and I, coming to agreement on the central notion of it all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Central notion maybe, but grammatically Harrison, it should have been Steve, George and me!</p>
<p>Not to be outdone, and proving that he also makes mistakes, Lucas then said, &#8220;Again, that&#8217;s the way it works with Steven and Harrison and I.&#8221;</p>
<p>The success of all three gentlemen only goes to prove my theory (see last week&#8217;s article) that grammar matters mainly to grammarians, and that as long as you can get your message across, most people don&#8217;t care about the odd misplaced &#8220;I&#8221;.</p>
<p>In my view, we enter grammar&#8217;s &#8220;Temple of Doom&#8221; when mistakes are made in important written documents or emails.  People have lost jobs, lost contracts, or have even been passed over for promotions because of their poor grammar.</p>
<p>What should you or Indiana do if you have to write something important?</p>
<p>That easy.  Just visit &#8220;<a href="http://www.grammarcheckersoftwware.com" title="grammar checker">The Temple of WhiteSmoke</a>&#8221; for the <a href="http://www.grammarcheckersoftwware.com" title="Grammar checker ">grammar checker</a> that turns erroneous &#8220;I&#8221;s into &#8220;me&#8221;s.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fgrammarcheckersoftware.com%2Fblog%2Findiana-jones-and-the-glorious-grammar-gaffe';
  addthis_title  = 'Indiana+Jones+and+The+Glorious+Grammar+Gaffe';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/indiana-jones-and-the-glorious-grammar-gaffe/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Grammar Too Confusing?</title>
		<link>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/is-grammar-too-confusing</link>
		<comments>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/is-grammar-too-confusing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar checker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitesmoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/whitesmoke/is-grammar-too-confusing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s Seattle Times had an terrific article on common grammar mistakes, and while James J. Kilpatrick had sound advice, I couldn&#8217;t help think that it&#8217;s all a bit too confusing.
On the one hand, there were excellent tips on using &#8220;that&#8221; and &#8220;which&#8221; (avoid &#8220;which&#8221; like the plague), and when to use &#8220;that&#8221; or &#8220;who&#8221; (&#8221;who&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Seattle Times had an terrific article on common grammar mistakes, and while James J. Kilpatrick had sound advice, I couldn&#8217;t help think that it&#8217;s all a bit too confusing.</p>
<p>On the one hand, there were excellent tips on using &#8220;that&#8221; and &#8220;which&#8221; (avoid &#8220;which&#8221; like the plague), and when to use &#8220;that&#8221; or &#8220;who&#8221; (&#8221;who&#8221; is for humans, &#8220;that&#8221; for everything else).  But then things got a bit tricky.</p>
<p>For example, in the phrase &#8220;whether or not&#8221;, the &#8220;or not&#8221; is actually redundant, since &#8220;whether&#8221; implies an option.  But, for some reason, it&#8217;s OK to be &#8220;benignly redundant&#8221; and include the &#8220;or not&#8221;.</p>
<p>Confused?  Me too!</p>
<p>On the one had I enjoy the that grammar  enables us to communicate better.  That is if we have time to understand all the rules.  But on the other hand, I tend to stick with a principle I came across a few years ago, namely write to be understood &#8211; and if it&#8217;s grammatically incorrect, that&#8217;s OK.  As long as the message gets over.</p>
<p>One caveat is that if the communication is an important one &#8211; a business letter, a college essay, or a business proposal &#8211; then use a grammar checker like <a href="http://grammarcheckersoftware.com" title="Grammar checker software">WhiteSmoke</a> to clean up the errors.    It&#8217;s well worth the investment to avoid a critical mistake when something important is on the line.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fgrammarcheckersoftware.com%2Fblog%2Fis-grammar-too-confusing';
  addthis_title  = 'Is+Grammar+Too+Confusing%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/is-grammar-too-confusing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Write Better Emails and Letters by Mastering the Apostrophe</title>
		<link>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/how-to-write-better-emails-and-letters-by-mastering-the-apostrophe</link>
		<comments>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/how-to-write-better-emails-and-letters-by-mastering-the-apostrophe#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[write better]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/grammar-tips/how-to-write-better-emails-and-letters-by-mastering-the-apostrophe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most common grammar errors is misusing the apostrophe.  Here&#8217;s how to write better emails, letters, etc., by mastering this tricky grammar term.  An apostrophe can either indicate the possessive form of a word (e.g. John&#8217;s) or the absence of letters, such as in a contraction (e.g. don&#8217;t).
Uses:
1. Adding an apostrophe to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most common grammar errors is misusing the apostrophe.  Here&#8217;s how to write better emails, letters, etc., by mastering this tricky grammar term.  An apostrophe can either indicate the possessive form of a word (e.g. John&#8217;s) or the absence of letters, such as in a contraction (e.g. don&#8217;t).</p>
<p><strong>Uses:</strong><br />
1. Adding an apostrophe to a noun indicates that something belongs to it.  To determine whether or not an apostrophe should be added, conduct a simple test that turns the phrase around to be “of the&#8230;” subject.</p>
<ul>
<li>The boy&#8217;s cat or “The cat of the boy.” (correct)</li>
<li>The lady&#8217;s purse, or “The purse of the lady.” correct)</li>
<li>The boat&#8217;s sail or “The sail of the boat.” (incorrect)</li>
</ul>
<p>In the third example, the boat did not have to take on the possessive form because the noun after “of the” was one of three exceptions for the “of the&#8230;” test: a building, an object, or furniture piece. Rather, it can simply be written as “the car door” to signify the door belongs to the car.</p>
<p>The apostrophe is placed in different parts of a word.  For singular words, add an “’s” to the end, even if the final letter is an “s.”</p>
<ul>
<li> The king&#8217;s crown was silver.</li>
<li> Jarvis&#8217;s writing is terrific.</li>
</ul>
<p>For plural words that end in “s,” simply add an apostrophe.</p>
<ul>
<li> The cows’ tails swung from side to side.</li>
</ul>
<p>When plural words do not end in “s,” add an “s”.</p>
<ul>
<li>The children’s rooms were untidy.</li>
</ul>
<p>Note that for compound words and the last noun of a joint possession, an &#8220;s&#8221; is added.</p>
<ul>
<li> sister-in-law’s</li>
<li>Jack and Jill&#8217;s</li>
</ul>
<p>For contractions, replace missing letters with an apostrophe; but remember that it’s where the letters no longer are, which is not always where the words are joined. An example would be “is not” and “isn’t.”</p>
<ul>
<li> You are = You&#8217;re</li>
<li> We are= We&#8217;re</li>
<li> Do not = Don’t</li>
<li> Should not = Shouldn&#8217;t</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Misuse:</strong><br />
Make sure not to misplace the apostrophe because it can change the meaning of a word, such as “it’s” and “its.” Or, if it is missing from a word like “there’s,” it’s a spelling error: “theres.” This is especially confusing if the context suggests the true meaning might be “theirs.”</p>
<p>So pay careful attention to the apostrophe.  Getting its usage right is critical to writing better emails, documents, and sales letters.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fgrammarcheckersoftware.com%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-write-better-emails-and-letters-by-mastering-the-apostrophe';
  addthis_title  = 'How+to+Write+Better+Emails+and+Letters+by+Mastering+the+Apostrophe';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://grammarcheckersoftware.com/blog/how-to-write-better-emails-and-letters-by-mastering-the-apostrophe/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
